GMOS, away from genetically modified organisms from aka, continues to research in gene editing, sometimes referred to as “the next big thing in agriculture”.
The significant difference between the two is that in terms of gene editing, no foreign DNA is inserted into a plant, animal or microorganism to improve size, productivity, disease and insect resistance and improve drought resistance in some cases in some cases. Is.
In contrast, in the case of GMO, foreign DNA from an organism is injected to achieve a type or improvement of another or another in an animal. Some people are uncomfortable in this, or even lowly hostile, towards GMO. Frankenfoods are what some people call him.
An example of GMO is genetically modified salmon. In that case, an ocean pout was introduced into the genetic structure of a salmon, equal to a genetic on-off switch. This amendment gives the salmon a one -year round hunger that enables it to reach the size of the market rapidly.
In other words, these quick growing big fish can get better prices in the market, until they are accepted in the market.
While the Food and Drug Administration says that GMO foods are carefully studied, before they are sold to the public to ensure that those foods consumers currently eat and they are of non-GMO foods They do not affect them separately, some foreign markets, European Union and especially France, as well as many American consumers, see things differently. So differently that they are banned in some countries and voluntarily labeled in the United States as such.
Now enter genetic editing, which is the future of Canadian scientist Santosh Kumar Agricultural Crop Research. In a recent presentation for the Brandon Chamber of Commerce, he stated that the current research focuses on reproductive crops that are more productive without the use of foreign DNA. This, he said, improves the quality of crops, and GMO is more acceptable in the global market than crops.
Often called crispr, gene editing allows researchers to disable a gene by modifying a gene in a specific location or adding to a desirable feature. Think of a pair of scissors; Only in this case it is an enzyme that works instead. Enzymes allow researchers to properly insert or remove genes in an animal or plant DNA, with intended to improve their health, productivity and nutritional benefits.
Kumar said that to ensure that Canada retains its strong position in the agricultural market in the future, researchers are breeding better crops, while genetically staying away from modifying them. One of the major reasons for this is that Canada should be able to sell what grows.
He said that GMO label can remove some countries.
Conversely, crop bio -engineering research which incorporates gene editing, genomics and events is preferred.
It is important to note that gene editing works only within its DNA of a species. The goal is to bring the desired change that will be in the past with traditional reproduction practices. For centuries, farmers have rely on selective breeding, including breeding plants and animals with desirable symptoms for others to improve food production and quality. It clearly takes a lot of hit-ends to achieve this goal, not to mention a lot of time-sometimes generations of time. That is why gene-editing is often called “a high-technical form of selective reproduction”.
Researcher Lindsey Doesy Do Tit, a Washington State University, who focuses on biology and management of diseases affecting small seeded vegetative seed crops grown in the Pacific North Western Region of the United States, agrees to Kumar that crops agree to crops Market needs have to be met.
“It all depends on what the market accepts,” he said.
Keeping this in mind, Kumar said that his work at Brandon Research and Development Center focuses on non-GMO research methods that still improve crops. Wheat and barley are examples of food grains on which the center is working.
To increase the future of Canadian food industry, scientists have breed up varieties that are better adapted to remove challenges, such as crop diseases that are more prevalent in preferences, where most wheat is grown. These varieties also have better resistance to weather conditions like drought.
He told the group that the process resulted in an increase in yields in the time of crop time, pathological breeds and high quality of the final product. Talking about Canada’s work in the region so far, Kumar said that the country’s wheat is considered a “premium” in the global market. “Even Americans say this is really good.”
In addition, he said that GMO label can remove some countries, which is why gene editing is given priority.
Some researchers in the European Union involved in the GMO study have also left and went to other efforts. Extensive protest against GMOs and even paint GMOs splash on researchers’ cars, examples of resistance against GMOs.
A report on GMO states, “In this context of high opposition, a change of attitude towards GMO seems difficult to achieve in France, especially in the European Union.”
What about meat?
In 2023, the American Food and Drug Administration authorized gene-edited pigs to allow in the human food chain.
As a starter, the German-style sausage, made of five 2-year-old genetically edited pigs, cooked at Washington State University, was a test case. John Ottale, a professor at the college’s school of molecular biochemine, said that he passed through the FDA Food-Use Authority process for pigs, to show that it is safe to eat food made from animals using a crispr application.
For Ottale and their fellow researchers, the overall goal is to develop desirable symptoms for better food production and meat quality, which will help feed the planet’s growing population. This, in turn, is an important goal for increasing protein sources in developing countries.
But the research is beyond pigs. Ottale said that researchers are also working in cattle, goats and sheep, which are all important food producing animals.
The FDA Authority is investigative and limited to pigs in Otel’s research.
“But in the future, we will also demand the Food-Use Authority for other species,” he said.
FDA’s Center for Veterinary Science Director Trishi Forfa, with his agency’s role “to keep our regulatory approach to the development of science”.
“We believe that innovation in animal biotechnology provides tremendous opportunities to pursue human and animal health,” he said.
In an interview with Bloomberg News, AG Tech Accelerator CEO John Dombroski said, “We are driving for Ballpark just.” “Gene editing will be free to do tremendous things in AG Continum, and the promise is just huge. We will be able to fix food for amazing health and nutrition benefits. ,
Food security?
For food security, WSU researcher Ottale said that crisp editing has no concern about food security.
“DNA changes were not in any part of the genome that would make animals susceptible to infectious disease compared to normal non-edited pigs,” he said. “USDA FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Services) inspected animals before processing and carcasses after processing using standards applied on all processed livestock and found no abnormalities.”
Ottale also confirmed that as long as standard food-protection practices are used in enhancing, slaughtering, packaging and cooking, pork would be free from food-borne pathogens.
(To sign up for a free membership for food security news,Click Here)
