Food security does not take time.
In December 2024, as consumers gathered for holidays with loved ones across the country, news of news Remember two dozen foods He led to a hurry to the raging people who were trying to detect the right grocery list and change their menu. Unfortunately, it also sent dozens of people to the hospital.
It is no wonder that consumer confidence in food security is an all -time low. This is not hyperbole – it is from data 2024 Iffic Food and Health SurveyConfidence in food security has been 8%below the previous year, 62%, and conclusions suggest that about one -third consumer (32%) E. Food like coli is very concerned about diseases.
At the same time, a recent galulp pole shows that only 39% Americans Trust the government to ensure food security – a sense below 47% in 2019.
For food industry businesses, these numbers directly affect their brand reputation, consumer relations and lower line.
Misses the commercial cost of food
Food recall is one of the most disruptive and expensive events for a food company.
Average direct cost is $ 10 millionTo reflect expenses related to logistics, legal fees and public relations efforts.
The immediate financial burden is only part of the story. A 2022 nielseniq survey It turned out that 68% of consumers would stop buying from a brand after the food security incident. About half will share its negative experiences with others.
Depending on the severity of recall, it may take 1-4 years to return to the pre-transit levels for sales and consumer trusts, as seen in cases as seen in cases 2009 peanut recall, due to which it became about $ 1 billion In several months in the sales of lost peanuts.
Misses food: new rules, new challenges and new opportunities
Food recalls are multicolor – Namas elements contribute to their occurrence. Nevertheless, aggressive measures are mandatory to prevent 48 million people every year in the US with food -borne diseases.
In the beginning of 2025, dozens of new rules were implemented at the state level, to address all food safety issues. Similarly, a new federal law was proposed to protect consumers against Salmonella and other contradictions. It also includes:
- Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Section 204 (Enacted): This new Rule Businesses dealing with high -risk foods that mandate sets a comprehensive food traceability plan and logging tracking events and measures to create major data elements.
Read the guide how FSMA 204 will affect you.
- Salmonella structure for raw poultry products (Proposed): Food Safety and Inspection Services Proposal To prevent raw poultry products will install product standards, in which the specified levels or strains of Salmonella will be prevented from entering the market.
- Protect food containers from pfas (Proposed): Recently Revival law Designed to prevent the use of PFA in food containers. Greeceproof, waterproof and nonstick products are found, PFAs can contaminate food and give rise to serious health complications.
These rules are required to prevent food safety issues, but compliance may require heavy organizational efforts. In addition, changes are difficult when businesses are already busy with supply chain disruption, lack of labor and inflation pressure.
Therefore, when a single solution can address several issues, it is important to give it a proper idea.
The role of packaging in food security is more missing
Packaging plays a huge role in food security compared to many feelings. In an industry where cardboard boxes are still Go-Two solutions, the juice of high meal recall rates and emerging rules emphasizes the need for a better packaging product.
When it comes to remembering, there are two main issues with cardboard packaging: construction and traceability.
Construction
As a paper product, corrugated boxes are susceptible to moisture absorption, especially for fresh yield and meat, even when the boxes are waxed. In addition, because they are badly ventilated, they do not quickly calm the products (such as eggs or leafy greens).
It creates an environment conducive to the development of bacteria and increases the risk of contamination. The higher the risk of contamination, the greater the chances of remembering.
Detection ability
Preventing conditions where a recall may require, is one thing. Nevertheless, once recall is once recalled, businesses should quickly respond to reduce security risks.
Single-use packaging complicates this process. Unlike the reusable packaging solutions, traditional corrugated boxes lack underlying traceability features, making it difficult to identify and separate contaminated products.
This can miss wide, more expensive because companies can be wrongly remembered in favor of caution and destroyed thousands of dollars products to try to avoid outbreaks.
How to recall packaging bridges and prevention of loss
Working with food remembering food costs too much, and a proper part of it goes into the crisis response support.
Still what if those funds were first placed towards mitigation?
The financial benefits of investment in modern packaging solutions are sufficient. For example, better traceability can cut the cost of recall up to 80%, potentially saving ten million dollars to avoid the same.
Reduce contamination risk and product loss
Packaging solutions like Reusable plastic container (RPC) Prevent and reduce food safety risks and reputed damage. Unlike the corrugated, non-shrinking is less than coming into contact with bacteria, moisture and environmental contacts.
It is particularly important in production, meat and seafood areas, which leads to high contamination risk and increase in regulatory monitoring.
RPC is also a cost -worm: designed to be strong, RPCs protect better food than corrugated boxes. In turn, see a positive effect in business rejection; Their lower line improves.
Proceed from recall curve with traceability
Speed is one of the most important elements in recall management – it matters every hour. But it is necessary to take advantage of time Traceable packaging solution Therefore the batches can be separated quickly and missed expensive.
Both active and passive traceability play a role:
- Active tracking (Eg, IOT sensor) detect food in real time through the supply chain. This type of traceability increases the visibility of the asset at all times, helps businesses to see location, environment, temperature, and more, which misses and reduces losses.
- Inactive Track (Eg, RFID sensor) provides historical data on products, which proves to be important in tracking the origin, manufacturing details and batch performance of the product over time.
Packaging can be a strategic benefit
By improving safety measures and accountability through packaging options, companies strengthen their reputation for reliability and care. When consumers are convinced in the safety and quality of a brand products, they are more likely to be loyal to that brand – even when the market is unstable.
Packaging options such as RPCs also create better partner relations. Like consumers, when partners rely on your commitment to reduce risks, prevent losses and maintain compliance requirements, you give yourself a favorite partner as a favorite partner
Active Remedy: key to reducing food
In TOSCA, we help businesses meet today’s food safety challenges with innovative packaging systems and traceability solutions. Our reusable containers are designed to detect, safe, reduce costs and improve operating efficiency. Now by taking average steps, you can protect your supply chain and create a safe, more reliable brand.
visit toscaltd.com To know how TOSCA can help your business act on food security.
