New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday was unable to start a final hearing on a group of petitions challenging the 2023 law, which changed the SC-frame-rich composition of the panel for selection Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and ECS was eaten by important pre-determined matters of the day-to-day-time plan of the day.
The lawyers present for the petitioners led by Prashant Bhushan made three attempts during the first day of a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh, listed on Wednesday, listed in serial number 41, listened to the petitions, listened to turn on Wednesday.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who would defend the law, informed the bench that he was engaged for a day before the bench of the five-judge Constitution led by CJI Sanjeev Khanna, which some issues were the smooth implementation of arbitration awards Is disrupting “The bench may consider taking it some other day,” he requested.
Bhushan said that SG is visible in almost all cases and will always be busy in one or another court. “17 are law officials. He has already made his submission before the Constitution Bench. He may portray other law officials for other cases and cannot seek adjournment in the hearing of such a very important case, ”he said.
SG said, “I will not be less to make such arguments and leave it in court to consider my request.” The bench said that if two or three important cases, which included decades -old quarrels between Kerala and TN, who appointed the Vice Chancellor for your agricultural university against the rights of the Center on issues related to the arguments related to the Mulparayar Dam and Kerala’s arguments. For, it will definitely start, it will definitely start. Hearing.
The case was again mentioned for turning hearing at the beginning of the immediate lunch session, but there was a bench amid hearing the Kerala-Sentor dispute. At the end of the day, Bhushan again requested for immediate hearing.
After examining its calendar of cases prescribed for the next month, the bench initially said it would be able to hear only on March 19. However, on Bhushan’s firmness, it said that it will consider listing it as soon as possible. Adjust these petitions for a turn hearing.
On 3 February, the bench dismissed the petitioners’ petition to stay on the selection of CEC Rajiv Kumar, which has now been successful by Gyanash Kumar. The petitioners have challenged the validity of CEC and other ECS (appointment, terms of officer and office terms), Act, 2023.
On March 2, 2023 in the Anoop Baranwal case, the five-judge SC bench saw a legislative vacuum on this process for the selection of CEC and ECS and directed that a panel included a panel which includes the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition and the Chief Justice Will advise the President on appointments Election Commission of IndiaThe new law, which came into force from December 29, 2023, replaced the CJI with a union cabinet minister selected by the PM.
The petitioners argue that there is a firm catch on the entire selection process of the executive which raises doubts in the minds of the people about the fairness of the Election Commission, which in turn puts a question mark on the independent and fairness of elections.
[ad_1]
Source link